On Nov 14, 2007 1:17 PM, Matthew Allum <mallum@openedhand.com> wrote:
>
> Design decision. If you start really heavily supporting 3D its really
> difficult to keep things simple as well as Im not heavily convinced that
> full full 3D really buys you much UI wise beyond crazed 1980's
> neuromancer style things
>
3D in the UI may be dangerous (see e.g. the latest OSX incarnation for
good (coverflow, timemachine) and bad use of it (the dock)).
But IMHO bringing a "little" 3D doesn't mean anything, Maybe I'm
biased because I'm used to OpenGL stuff, but I think it's more
liberating for a programmer to assert that everything is now in a 3D
space with a 3D look (even if it's flat for most).
regards,
Christophe.
-- To unsubscribe send a mail to clutter+unsubscribe@o-hand.comReceived on Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:13:08 +0100
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 15 2007 - 05:00:13 EST