Re: [clutter] A little whining about version numbers

On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 12:11 -0700, Blake Ramsdell wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi_at_o-hand.com> wrote:
> > I should also strongly point out that, by using trunk, you're tracking a
> > highly unstable development branch. so, if something breaks, you get to
> > keep both the pieces.
>
> Or I can glue them back together if you want. Like PyClutter wants the
> stage parameter for redraw. I can fix this by either requiring that
> redraw take a stage parameter or make redraw a member of the stage
> object (though I suspect you might want to refactor the C name to be
> clutter_stage_redraw and move it to clutter_stage.h in that case).

clutter_redraw() should not be used by applications - every application
code should use the ClutterActor::queue_redraw() method instead.

in any case, and after the experience of 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6, making the
bindings track trunk is an incredibly bad idea; the bindings will have
to wait until the API in trunk enters a "slushy" state, with a
semi-frozen API. unless, obviously, people are willing to keep
submitting patches when trunk changes.

ciao,
 Emmanuele.

-- 
Emmanuele Bassi, OpenedHand Ltd.
Unit R, Homesdale Business Centre
216-218 Homesdale Rd., Bromley - BR12QZ
http://www.o-hand.com
-- 
To unsubscribe send a mail to clutter+unsubscribe_at_o-hand.com