Re: [gupnp] Introspection is here!

On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 12:08 +0300, Zeeshan Ali wrote:
> Hello again!
>
> > Ok. It probably doesn't really matter whether we keep an xmlDoc in
> > memory, or the same information in parsed form. Let's stick with the
> > current setup as it's easier.
>
> Thinking more about it, i realized that it won't require a lot of
> re-writing and re-structuring if i am allowed to cut two methods from
> the introspection:
>
> gupnp_service_introspection_list_action_arguments()
> gupnp_service_introspection_get_state_variable()
>
> since then there would be no need for mainting hashtables. I think
> i can do without these methods, what do you think?

I can't think of a scenario where these methods would really come in
necessary, and so if you agree and if this makes things less complex, I
think it may be worthwhile to remove them.

But let's not keep the xmlDoc and parsed data in memory at the same time
(just did this in trunk).

> > _list_state_variables() would still be very welcome though :)
>
> Ooh! it's already there, i'll send you the patch as soon i resolve
> the conflicts. :)

Yay! :)

Cheers,

Jorn

--
To unsubscribe send a mail to gupnp+unsubscribe\@o-hand.com