Re: [gupnp] two more introspection methods

On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 00:31 +0300, Zeeshan Ali wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > Does attached patch do what you need?
> > It's still rather rough and in need of cleaning up but it should work.
>
> Thanks a millions. That should do exactly what i need.
> Unfortunately! i can't readily test it out so if it works for you,
> then just commit it with whatever cleanup you need to do.

Ok, committed. Let me know if there any problems.

Thanks,

Jorn

>
> > Also do you have any naming suggestions? I don't like the "_hash" suffix
> > much but can't think of a better alternative.
>
> Hmm.. '_hash_table' and '_htable' is the only ones that come to
> mind. :( The former looks good and is descriptive but makes the
> complete names of the functions too big. '_htable' is more descriptive
> than '_hash' at least but still not very clear and doesn't look nice.
>

--
To unsubscribe send a mail to gupnp+unsubscribe\@o-hand.com